|
Post by account_disabled on Dec 14, 2023 4:20:55 GMT -5
It's worth pointing out that it's possible for webmasters to disavow links rather than remove them. We do not have access to this data, so we cannot determine the program. It's possible that some webmasters choose to disavow, while others choose to delete, and the net impact on the link value is the same, making the variance calculation incorrect. Will webmasters increase ad spend? I admit, I had my hopes up about this. Honestly, who wouldn't want to show that Google only punishes webmasters because it helps their bottom line. Wouldn't it be great if the Search Quality team were found to have been dishonest C Level Contact List about? Well, unfortunately it's not confirmed. The evidence is quite clear, and there is no reason to believe that webmasters will increase ad spending following the Penguin penalty. Let's look at the numbers. Increased ad traffic From this we can safely conclude that there does not appear to be a direct causal relationship between Penguin's penalties and increased spending. Now, one can certainly make the argument that better search results may increase future ad revenue as Google attracts more users to its better search engine, but accusations is a fiduciary motive for releasing an update like this cannot be made Confirm with this data. Have they recovered? By month 1, approximately the number is penalized website traffic was at or above Penguin's previous traffic. This is an exciting result because it does show that penguin recovery is possible.
|
|